A Child's Right

MI: 2013-2014 Equal Parenting Bill HB 4120

http://legislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?2013-HB-4120

Bill to require the family court to award equally shared physical custody unless there is clear and convincing evidence of unfitness, in-ability or unwillingness to equally parent. Contact the politicians and get them to work on this now.

Sponsor http://www.gophouse.com/welcome.asp?District=042 State Rep Rogers

http://www.gophouse.com/welcome.asp?District=097 State Rep Johnson

http://www.gophouse.com/welcome.asp?District=080 State Rep Genetski

http://www.gophouse.com/welcome.asp?District=047 State Rep Denby

http://www.gophouse.com/welcome.asp?District=106 State Rep Pettalia

http://www.gophouse.com/welcome.asp?District=105 State Rep MacMaster

http://www.gophouse.com/welcome.asp?District=101 State Rep Franz

http://www.gophouse.com/welcome.asp?District=058 State Rep Kurtz

http://www.gophouse.com/welcome.asp?District=033 State Rep Goike

Michigan Equally Shared Parenting Bill HB 4778 Action:

http://www.legislature.mi.gov/%28S%283prvktaxfxrrtrnv2yyc55et%29%29/mileg.aspx?page=GetObject&objectname=2011-HB-4778

Those of you who live in Michigan please go to this bill and then contact each one of the sponsors of this bill. If you know someone in Michigan please ask them to contact these sponsors. Let the sponsors know that we appreciate their support but now is the time to get movement on the bill. The sponsors need to present the bill via a legislative forum in the House and or the Senate Office Buildings. Also they need to pressure their Judiciary Committee colleagues to have a hearing or move the legislation to another committee or to the floor for a vote.

OR: End False Child Abuse Claims Bill

http://ping.fm/wfPw2
Oregon gets it right: End False Child Abuse Claims

Gingrich and Santorum Create War on Fathers

http://ping.fm/8ClVK
Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum led the effort to make the states create non-custodial parents and lock-up poor fathers. Title IV-D was modified to say that ALL mothers who are on welfare who could possibly ever be on welfare are to get tax payer provided Child Support enforcement. Those mothers who are on welfare where to have their child support orders turned over to the state to enforce with encarceration and confescation of property their tools to enforce bloated income sharing support orders.

Have we created a Matriarchy that is bankrupting nations, abusing children?

Have we created a Matriarchy that is bankrupting nations, abusing children?

The new feminism (second wave [the radicals]) who have to be a part of everything male while acting in a misandric fashion are creating a sadistic Matriarchy across the globe. If Men and women split everything 50/50 and women get 50% of the man's 50 and 7/8ths of the remaining twenty five
percent as special entitlements that equals 97.25% - maybe that is why females make the majority of retail purchases.

I can envision men reading this crossing their legs, wringing their hands uncomfortably almost whining: I hope they read the rest of this, check out the links, STOP, breathe and then reflect: the truth is in the studies. We have for decades lazily subscribed to urban myth even though lies have been
proven and dispelled:

<http://dadsofmichigan.blogspot.com/2011/07/warshak-brief-in-lamagusa.html>

Warshak

Apparently the Jewish community is concerned with a dwindling male membership <http://dadsofmichigan.blogspot.com/2011/07/end-of-jewish-men.html>
The end of Jewish Men are not the Protestant and Catholic Communities facing the same situation?

Not all single mothers are sadistic but images of Britney, Lindsey and Casey should wake us up a little simply look up female violence on You Tube . "`Oh say it is not true" exclaim the gentlemen twisting in their seats, perhaps, but this material is not made up <http://antimisandry.com/abuse-dv/>
Bringing Attention to Abuse By Females it is true Google has tried to censor such material as hate speech preferring homosexual friendly comments (sorry their editorial preference and a true statement simply ask bloggers).

All mothers probably are not that violent despite the ones we have seen grabbing their children by the arm in the grocery store, we do know (even if we are afraid to discuss it) at least some moms utilize the electronic babysitter, we have been talking about it for decades, but could it lead to this: <http://westmichigandad.wordpress.com/2011/07/13/should-parents-of-obese-kids-lose-custody/>

Should parents of obese kids lose custody?

* We know Fathers petition Courts for custody, joint custody, shared custody, parenting time, access to their children everyday, and, everyday leave the Court Room broken hearted despite the evidence demonstrating the criticality of fathers to their children's development,

<http://antimisandry.com/forums/> Forum

<http://antimisandry.com/forums/#wisdom-library> . Wisdom Library

<http://antimisandry.com/facts-figures/> . Facts and Figures

<http://antimisandry.com/essential/> . Essential There are only about one hundred and six entries there you could also try <http://westmichigandad.wordpress.com/research/>
Research there are only thirty-eight hyper-linked references there.

The Public Broadcast System actually airs programming that touches upon religion, last weekend I listened to a Catholic Bishop lamenting the injury upon all of those poor families that the current budget debacle will cause.
I am certain the Bishop truly had in mind social injustice to less fortunate people _ I truly believe the Bishop had no conception at all he really is lamenting a minor loss in funding for the enabling of single mother homes whilst depriving children of their fathers.

There is no logic in promoting Fatherhood whilst denigrating Fathers. There is no logic in promoting a social system that separates children from their fathers whilst costing America three hundred thirty-six billion dollars annually Sex, <http://dadsofmichigan.blogspot.com/2011/07/sex-money.html>
money.and national bankruptcies.

Perhaps no one really cares enough to have read this far, or someone is yawning, or instead of twisting in their seat someone has urinated, can we seriously imagine grown adults so afraid of women, there are afraid to read this?

Mothers are sacred, mothers are scary, what am I thinking, well I am not the happiest camper in the entire world but I am not alone; <http://westmichigandad.wordpress.com/2011/05/09/mothers-day-2011-not-so-purdy-americass-pbs-documentary/>
Mother's Day 2011: not so Purdy - Americas's PBS documentary, <http://dadsofmichigan.blogspot.com/2011/07/mother-mother-where-are-you.html>
Mother, mother, where are you?, Another Broken Heart <http://antimisandry.com/father-children/another-broken-heart-40104.html#post266672> truth to tell this is but a minor glimpse of the anecdotal evidence.

As the men continue to cringe I can imagine someone uttering a derogatory remark. Do we even know how to educate males STOP, please do not be so sure about yourself, have you read anything found here: <http://www.michaelgurian.com/books_dvds.html>
Michael Gurian , any of these Books for Fathers .
<http://dadsofmichigan.blogspot.com/p/books-for-fathers.html>
Do we really know what we are advocating for: In the matter of: <http://dadsofmichigan.blogspot.com/2011/07/in-matter-of-pornography-v-romantic.html>
pornography v, romantic fantasies , <http://dadsofmichigan.blogspot.com/2011/07/parental-alienation.html>

Parental Alienation
<http://dadsofmichigan.blogspot.com/2011/07/in-our-good-do-we-do-bad.html>
In our good do we do bad Long letter, nothing is simple, our children deserve their Fathers, our Boys
deserve to be treated for who they are, our Congregations, Synagogues and Parishes deserve participation from both sexes.

MI: HB 4778 Equally Shared Parenting Bill

Here is the 2011 MI Equally Shared Parenting Bill that has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee.

http://legislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?2011-HB-4778

 

Subject: HB 4778 of 2011

 

Family law; child custody; joint custody; mandate in every custody dispute between parents except in certain circumstances. Amends secs. 5 & 6a of 1970 PA 91 (MCL 722.25 & 722.26a). Last Action: 6/16/2011 - referred to Committee on Judiciary

 

 

Darrick Scott-Farnsworth

FB: A Child's Right Equal Parental Rights

Cell 269 209-7144 or Nextel DC ID 130*112*19287

Fight the Collective: Individual Life, Liberty and Property Rights

MD: SB 909 Equal Parenting Action Now

David Carlin March 21 at 1:44pm Report
Call to action:

Please forward this to your networks and have your members make the calls to support and testify at this hearing on SB909 sponsored by Senator C. Anthony Muse.

March 23, 2011 at 1pm Senate hearing on SB909 (child's rights to access both parents) We need everybody to make calls and send emails and prepare testimony and be at this hearing if possible. You will need to register early 10-12:00 noon and bring 20 copies of your testimony. Bill Link: http://mlis.state.md.us/2011rs/billfile/sb0909.htm
General Assembly information numbers: 301-970-5400 and 410-946-5400
Senate Phone numbers (410) 841-xxxx or (301)858-xxxx
Please make the calls today and please be at the hearing if possible.

Senate Judiciary Committee members:

Brian E Frosh (D) 301-858-3124 [email protected]
Lisa A. Gladden (D) 301-858-3697 [email protected]
James Brochin (D) 301-858-3648 [email protected]
Jennie M. Forehand (D) 301-858-3134 [email protected]
Joseph M. Getty (R) 301-858-3683 [email protected]
Nancy Jacobs (R) 301-858-3158 [email protected]
Victor R. Ramirez (D) 301-858-3745 [email protected]
Jamie Raskin (D) 301-858-3634 [email protected]
Christopher B. Shank (R) 301-858-3903 [email protected]
Norman R. Stone Jr. (D) 301-858-3587 [email protected]
Robert A. Zirkin (D)301-858-3131 [email protected]

BILL INFO-2011 Regular Session-SB 909
mlis.state.md.us
Creating a rebuttable presumption that joint legal custody and physical custody to each parent for approximately equal periods of time is in the best interest of the child in specified child custody proceedings.

Fatherless Families Videos

YouTube - IWant2CMyChild's Channel http://ping.fm/GGFXn

DADS AND MOMS PAC ANNOUNCES FAMILY PUBLIC POLICY PRIORITIES FOR 2011

For Release:     Contact:
March 14, 2011    DADS and Moms PAC
    248-467-1204

DADS AND MOMS PAC
ANNOUNCES FAMILY PUBLIC POLICY PRIORITIES FOR 2011

Advocating for family preservation, shared parenting, child support reform and other key family issues during the current legislative session       
BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI – Dads and Moms PAC, a responsible family and fatherhood education and advocacy organization, today released their legislative agenda for 2011.  The organization consulted with US and Michigan Legislators, US Department of Health and Human Services, Michigan Judges and Lawyers, Family Service Counselors, Heritage Foundation, National Center for Fathering, MOMS of Michigan, Children Need Both Parents, Fathers a Childs Rights, Fathers For Equal Rights, Family Rights Coalition, American Coalition of Fathers and Children, and the Children’s Rights Council in preparing the public policy agenda.  The proposed agenda will save the state a billion dollars in expenses each year.
Dads and Moms PAC announced the focus of their public policy agenda with the follows issues: 
•    Sharing Parenting
•    Parenting Time Guidelines
•    Paternity
•    Parenting Plans
•    Family Education Program
•    Child Support
“We will continue to work this year on progressive legislation and reforms that will help families to stay together and provide the best interest of children with the best opportunities available,” said James Semerad, Washington DC Representative of Dads of Michigan PAC.  For more information or interviews, please call 248-467-1204
####
Dads and Moms PAC is a responsible family preservation education and advocacy organization dedicated to keeping both biological parents actively engaged in the lives of their children despite divorce and custody, in most instances.  We believe men and women should be viewed equally under the law and our credo is: "fathers are responsible parents too…because the best parent is both parents."

IOWA Shared Parenting HF 345 Passes Out of Committee - Eligible for Floor Debate

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

IowaFathers

HF 345 Passes Out of Committee - Eligible for Floor Debate

March 4, 2011

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

Dear Jim,

 

Great News! House File 345, passed out of the House Judiciary Committee this week 11-10.  The bill, which creates a rebuttable presumption of joint physical care, is now eligible for debate on the House Floor.  A rally date at the Capitol is currently being planned and the details will be released soon!

 

Please send Rep. Kaufmann, Rep. Rogers, Rep. Abul-Samad, Rep. Rasmussen, Rep. Sands, and Rep. Muhlbauer an individual thank you for introducing this bill and for their hard work in getting HF 345 through committee.

 

In order to successfully pass HF 345 on the House Floor, we need to gain more support.  I'm asking all members and concerned citizens to please start emailing all members of the Iowa House of Representatives asking them to support HF 345.  For your convenience, all Iowa House Representatives email addresses are listed below for copy and paste:

 

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 

[email protected]; [email protected];[email protected]; [email protected];[email protected]; [email protected]; 

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];  [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];

[email protected]; [email protected];  [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 

[email protected]; [email protected];  [email protected]; [email protected];  [email protected]; [email protected];

[email protected]; [email protected];  [email protected]; [email protected];  [email protected]; [email protected]; 

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];  [email protected]; [email protected];

[email protected]; [email protected];  [email protected]; [email protected];  [email protected]; [email protected]; 

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 

[email protected];  [email protected]; [email protected]; 

[email protected]; [email protected];  [email protected]; [email protected];

 

Below is the email I am personally sending to the entire Iowa House on HF 345.  Please feel free to use my research in your email.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Dear Iowa House of Representatives,

 

I'm hopeful you will allow children the opportunity to have equal access to both parents by voting in favor of HF 345.

 

Click here for a thesis explaining in-depth the legality need along with the social need for a rebuttable presumption of joint physical care here in Iowa.  

 

A few key points that I would like to stress are as follows:

 

•         Joint physical care or shared parenting is when both parents share physical placement of the child(ren). Simply defined, joint physical care allows the child(ren) to live with each parent 50% of the time during the year.

 

•         In all thirty-three comparative studies in the U.S. comparing the outcomes of children in joint physical care to those in the care of only one parent found that children in joint physical care have better outcomes (Bauserman, 2002).

 

•         The percentage of all births that were to unmarried women more than doubled between 1980 and 2008. In 2008, 41 percent of births were to unmarried women, up from 40 percent in 2007. Increases have occurred for women in all age groups, with the largest increases measured for women in their twenties (America's Children in Brief: Key National Indicators of Well-Being, 2010).

 

•         Mothers win primary physical care in 84.4 percent of the cases (Support Providers: 2002, 2005).

 

•         According to recent studies, approximately 40 percent of child victims were maltreated by their mothers acting alone; another 18.3 percent were maltreated by their fathers acting alone; 17.3 percent were abused by both parents (United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2007).

 

•         On specifically neglect, a study found that children living with just one parent, under any living arrangement, had significantly higher rates of Harm Standard neglect with 27.0 per 1,000 children compared to those living with two married biological parents with 4.2 per 1,000 children (Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS-4), 2010).

 

•         Research by Dr. Judith Wallerstein and Dr. Joan Berlin Kelly revealed that 50 percent of mothers either saw no value in the father's contact with his children and actively tried to sabotage it, or resented the father's contact (Wallerstein & Kelly, 1996).

 

•         According to the U.S. Department of Justice, an estimated 2.11 million persons under the age of eighteen were arrested in 2008, where 1 in 10 arrests were for murder and 1 in 4 arrests were for robbery, burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft. The report further showed that Iowa (92% reporting coverage) reported 252 juvenile violent crime arrests, 1792 juvenile property crime arrests, 396 juvenile drug abuse arrests, and 52 juvenile weapons arrests (Juvenile Arrests 2008, 2009).

 

The negative impacts of fatherless children cannot be ignored. Please support HF 345 which will create a rebuttable presumption of joint physical care and help ensure that Iowa's children gain access to both parents!

 

Sincerely,

Bryan Iehl

Founder & President

IowaFathers

PO Box 2884

Waterloo, IA  50704-2884

[email protected] 

 

 

 

 

Quick Links...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Our Website

Message Board

Events Calendar

IowFathers PAC Website